‘The Phantom’ Review: The Death Penalty for a Doppelgänger

“The Phantom,” a documentary from Patrick Forbes, examines a case that in recent times has been cited for instance of a probably wrongful conviction that ended within the dying penalty. Carlos DeLuna was executed in Texas in 1989 for the homicide of a Corpus Christi fuel station comfort retailer clerk. At his trial, he implicated one other man, Carlos Hernandez. The prosecution dismissed Hernandez as a phantom.

But the film, based mostly on an account by a Columbia regulation college professor, James Liebman, and his researchers, amasses proof that Hernandez, who died in 1999, was no apparition. It signifies that he had a historical past of violence and that the investigation was hasty. The movie’s most damning suggestion is that the conviction didn’t merely contain mistaken id — two males named Carlos, who knew and resembled one another and had been each within the space of the crime, getting blended up — however, within the movie’s argument, required an nearly willful insistence on turning a blind eye to what was identified.

Adapting analysis that’s, by now, hardly breaking information, Forbes has some stable methods for making the fabric cinematic. Shooting in shiny wide-screen, he makes use of an efficient mix of reconstructions and interviewees to take viewers by the night time of the killing. Earlier within the movie, he has individuals concerned within the unique trial, like a witness, Kevan Baker, and a prosecutor, Steve Schiwetz, talk about particulars of the case in a courtroom, and even playact variations of their phrases from the proceedings (the dialogue isn’t verbatim, judging from the trial transcript). A bow-tied, suspendered, haunted-looking health worker contributes to the ghostly atmosphere.

The Phantom
Not rated. Running time: 1 hour 22 minutes. In theaters.