WASHINGTON — It is a hoary custom: Outfox historical past, in the event you can.
You would possibly name this maneuver: I actually wasn’t the horrible particular person I used to be. I need to be remembered because the particular person I would like you to assume I used to be.
Distancing from failure or embarrassment is a part of each politico’s talent set. I knew a high Democrat within the Clinton period who distanced himself from his personal son throughout a contact soccer sport after the child performed badly.
James Baker and Dina Powell, advisers to Republican presidents, could have been the all-time masters of this darkish artwork, merely gliding away from their administrations’ catastrophes like black silk.
In a raft of latest books about Donald Trump and one about Facebook, there are a panoply of well-known folks making an attempt to disclaim and exfoliate their previous culpability. Unfortunately for them, it’s in a half-baked, moderately than a full-Baker, means. As those that enabled Trump and Mark Zuckerberg to construct their actuality distortion fields thrash about making an attempt to flip the script, historical past is being set in amber.
In “An Ugly Truth: Inside Facebook’s Battle for Domination,” Times writers Sheera Frenkel and Cecilia Kang describe a deleterious sample at Facebook: Don’t convey the boss dangerous information or push again. Exercise willful blindness concerning the catastrophe across the nook, after which, as soon as it arrives, handle it badly. Put the syndicate over democracy. Blame others in your errors, particularly the unfair media. Present your self as doing good for the world while you’re doing dangerous.
That completely captures the routine contained in the Trump White House as effectively.
Frenkel and Kang write about how Zuckerberg has distanced himself from his consigliere Sheryl Sandberg and diminished her function, despite the fact that he wants her and despite the fact that she helped him earn money hand over fist.
He needed to remain in his hermetically sealed field enjoying tech visionary, Kang informed me, and blame Sandberg for the fallout over Cambridge Analytica, overseas interference within the 2016 election, disinformation within the 2020 election, misinformation about Covid-19 and the vaccines. This is even if with regards to vital points for Facebook, resembling how you can deal with disinformation complaints and whether or not to ban Trump, Zuckerberg makes all the selections.
“He is blaming her basically for bad PR, for allowing the public to have this negative impression of Facebook,” Kang mentioned.
Sandberg was employed to be the grownup within the room, however she was too afraid to push again on Zuckerberg in any main means. And she, too, had the dangerous habits of listening to solely what she needed to listen to and surrounding herself with Facebook workers who practiced groupthink.
“Even as they have grown distant and are trying to distance themselves from controversy, they are inextricably entwined to each other and Facebook,” Kang mentioned. “They built a business that is unabated and shows no signs of slowing down.”
But the Biden administration doesn’t function inside a actuality distortion area. This previous week, with the president at his wit’s finish over the continued unfold of vaccine misinformation and Facebook’s unwillingness to show over knowledge on how a lot data is spreading on its web site, stress between the White House and Facebook exploded.
“They’re killing folks,’’ President Biden informed reporters exterior the White House on Friday.
His surgeon common, Dr. Vivek Murthy, declared for the primary time that the bile on social media was a menace to the well being of Americans.
It can be going to be an Augean job for individuals who encircled Trump to distance themselves and rehab their reputations.
“I Alone Can Fix It,” the buzzy new guide by Washington Post writers Philip Rucker and Carol Leonnig, stories that Ivanka Trump “had become increasingly uncomfortable with efforts to overturn the election results” and that, when her father was badgering his vp to assist in the nefarious scheme, she fretted to a nationwide safety official, “Mike Pence is a good man.”
Her lived expertise is that she solely went to her father’s Jan. 6 “Save America Rally” to maintain him on a fair keel. Never thoughts the truth that as soon as Daddy’s mob started doing its worst, she addressed the scofflaws on Twitter as “American patriots.”
After breaking artistic new floor within the space of sycophancy, Pence mentioned final month in a speech on the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library that he was “proud” that he licensed the election.
And there’s former Attorney General William Barr, who backed up a lot of Trump’s madness, solely to see the sunshine after he left the job, telling ABC News journalist Jonathan Karl for his new guide, “Betrayal,” that Trump’s claims of election fraud had been “all bullshit.”
Michael Bender of The Wall Street Journal stories in his guide, “‘Frankly, We Did Win This Election,’” that Mike Pompeo, the highest diplomat who was so usually a toady for Trump, began appearing all involved after the election that Trump would possibly begin a global battle to remain in workplace.
“The crazies have taken over,” Pompeo informed a colleague, in accordance with Bender.
The crazies hadn’t taken over. They had been there all alongside, enabling the opposite crazies.
The Times is dedicated to publishing a variety of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you concentrate on this or any of our articles. Here are some suggestions. And right here’s our e mail: [email protected]
Follow The New York Times Opinion part on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.