It’s early 2019, a number of months earlier than Jeffrey Epstein will likely be arrested on intercourse expenses, and he’s sitting within the huge research of his New York mansion with a digicam pointed at him as he practices for an enormous “60 Minutes” interview that may by no means happen.
The media coach is a well-known determine: Steve Bannon, Donald Trump’s marketing campaign guru and onetime White House adviser. Mr. Bannon is each conducting the interview and training Mr. Epstein on the little issues, telling him he’ll come throughout as silly if he doesn’t look immediately into the digicam at times, and advising him not to share his racist theories on how Black individuals study. Mainly, Mr. Bannon tells Mr. Epstein, he ought to stick to his message, which is that he’s not a pedophile. By the tip, Mr. Bannon appears impressed.
“You’re engaging, you’re not threatening, you’re natural, you’re friendly, you don’t look at all creepy, you’re a sympathetic figure,” he says.
This explosive, beforehand unreported episode, linking a pacesetter of the best with the now-dead disgraced financier, is tucked away on the finish of a brand new e-book by Michael Wolff, “Too Famous: The Rich, the Powerful, the Wishful, the Notorious, the Damned.” Mr. Bannon confirmed in a press release that he inspired Mr. Epstein to communicate to “60 Minutes” and mentioned that he had recorded greater than 15 hours of interviews with him.
He disputed Mr. Wolff’s characterization of the transcript, nonetheless. Mr. Bannon, who has made 15 documentaries, mentioned that he “never media-trained anyone” and was recording the interview for a beforehand unannounced eight- to 10-hour documentary meant to illustrate how Mr. Epstein’s “perversions and depravity toward young women were part of a life that was systematically supported, encouraged and rewarded by a global establishment that dined off his money and his influence.”
Mr. Bannon was a serious character — and an ideal on-the-record supply — for Mr. Wolff’s largest success, “Fire and Fury,” his best-selling, no-holds-barred account of the Trump White House. To write about Mr. Bannon’s dealings with Mr. Epstein within the new e-book, Mr. Wolff relied on transcripts of what Mr. Epstein seems to consider are observe interviews. Where did he get the transcripts, not to point out a raft of different new particulars in regards to the final days of Mr. Epstein’s life? Mr. Wolff gained’t say, and his narrative technique is not any assist both. As typical, he depends on an omniscient third-person narration in “Too Famous,” an strategy that has for many years drawn criticism from reporters like me as a result of it doesn’t hassle to embody explanations of how the writer got here by his info.
I met with Mr. Wolff on Tuesday in Amagansett, on Long Island. He was wearing white, and his white hair was cropped brief. He welcomed me into his second residence, a vivid, ethereal place that he was ready to purchase, for $three million, thanks to “Fire and Fury,” which bought greater than 5 million copies, in accordance to the writer, permitting him to lastly afford the approach to life he had already been dwelling.
Mr. Wolff, 68, has been at this since earlier than I had a byline, infuriating his rivals by the entry he will get, the tales he tells and the gleeful method he tells them. And he has been the topic of items like this one — scolding profiles of the journalist enfant horrible and New York media scenester — for many years.
He has managed to keep on the prime of his recreation due to his timeless curiosity and experience in a specific topic: large, unhealthy males. What Oprah Winfrey is to tearful celebrities and earnest royals, Mr. Wolff is to louche energy gamers. The litany is astounding: Roger Ailes, Rupert Murdoch, Harvey Weinstein, Boris Johnson, Mr. Bannon, Mr. Trump. All seem in his new e-book, a group of profiles, some beforehand printed, some not.
Magnates appear to suppose Mr. Wolff provides them their finest shot at a sympathetic portrait. He writes, in “Too Famous,” that Mr. Weinstein referred to as him throughout his 2020 rape trial to suggest a biography. “This book is worth millions,” Mr. Weinstein informed him, in accordance to Mr. Wolff. “You keep domestic, I’ll take foreign.” As for Mr. Epstein? “He wanted me to write something about him — a kind of a book — it wasn’t clear why,” Mr. Wolff informed me.
Few girls seem in “Too Famous.” Tina Brown, Arianna Huffington and Hillary Clinton are the exceptions. “These are the women, and there are not too many, who have done exactly what men would do,” he mentioned. And Democrats not often speak to him. “They don’t have a sense of play,” he mentioned.
So what’s it about Michael Wolff that has introduced him so shut to the egomaniacs of our time? If I had his confidence about moving into different individuals’s minds, I’d say it was as a result of they see themselves mirrored, perhaps even envied, in his giant eyes, which open just a little wider when he needs you to hold speaking.
He grew to become pleasant with numerous moguls within the 1980s and 1990s when, after a promising begin as a author, he took a run at becoming a member of their membership himself. He began an organization, Wolff New Media, that printed books in regards to the web when it was the brand new factor. In the mid-1990s, he was value $100 million (on paper) and had a stipple portrait in The Wall Street Journal.
Business & Economy
Updated Sept. 10, 2021, 7:00 p.m. ETAn annual report on U.S. poverty and Apple’s latest merchandise: What’s coming subsequent week.Mattel dusts off He-Man, with a nod to range.Democrats are floating a plan to tax inventory buybacks.
When all of it got here crashing down in 1997, he wrote about it, scorching the buyers who had backed him in a jovial memoir, “Burn Rate.” The e-book earned him a column in New York journal and a daily desk at Michael’s, residence of the ability lunch for the Manhattan media set.
The writer of “Fire and Fury” within the library of his residence in Greenwich Village.Credit…Todd Heisler/The New York Times
It’s a curious truth of journalism that it has many guidelines, however probably the most profitable journalists appear to be those who’re all the time breaking them. Mr. Wolff — who dislikes the j-word, and considers himself a author — prefers blurred traces and compromised relationships to cut-and-dry journalism-school readability.
When he talks with highly effective males in finance and politics, he mentioned, he falls right into a little bit of a Walter Mitty trance that he may very well be dwelling their lives, one thing they will sense and respect. And on condition that many of those figures should select to inform their tales both to rule-abiding journalists, who usually view them as monsters, or to sycophantic lightweights, you may see the enchantment of going with somebody who can relate to your struggles. (Mr. Wolff’s divorce and remarriage acquired savage tabloid protection.) And, he informed me, he thinks that almost all of those reviled characters “are not as bad as everyone says,” including, “Just the fact that everyone says it means they’re not.”
“This doesn’t mean that they’re not bad and haven’t done terrible things,” he continued. “But everybody who achieves that kind of power and centrality has done terrible things — you know, behind every great fortune is a great crime.”
He can also be ready to acquire the arrogance of moguls as a result of he lets them know he has the identical enemies they do — that’s, nearly everybody within the information media, whom he has all the time made a degree of disdaining. He bonded with Mr. Ailes, the previous Fox News chief whose profession led to sexual harassment allegations, over shared Establishment enemies, he mentioned. And he ingratiated himself with Mr. Trump and his circle, partially, by publicly attacking different reporters who lined him, sneering at one level that the beat lined by Maggie Haberman for The New York Times appeared to be the “aberrant” presidency.
When “Fire and Fury” arrived in 2018, nonetheless, it painted a extra excessive image of the president than most newspaper reviews, even because it relied on lots of the particulars unearthed by White House beat reporters. Mr. Wolff insisted that he hadn’t meant to deceive the individuals he was writing about — he was simply stunned to discover how unhealthy it was on the within.
He additionally argues that the fact-based, evenhanded strategy of a lot nonfiction writing as of late has turned what used to be referred to as journal journalism right into a misplaced artwork. He would fairly not sully his textual content with such bothersome issues as supply attributions and footnotes, asking readers to merely belief him and the ability of his narrative.
“I’m type of the one one doing these items now,” he mentioned over a dosa at Hampton Chutney, the place, he famous, you may typically run into Paul McCartney. Mr. Wolff mentioned he was the final one within the enterprise of “journalism as the experience, journalism as writing.” Now, he mentioned, “Everyone is more interested in the bill of particulars.”
An issue with this viewpoint is that a number of of the best writers from the glory days of journal journalism freely blended truth and fiction. And writers who stray too removed from explicit information might find yourself getting the generalities flawed. Given that I hail from the bill-of-particulars college, I’ve discovered Mr. Wolff to be annoyingly correct on big-picture questions starting from the enduring power of the tv enterprise to the key motives of moguls.
I couldn’t write about these type of blurred journalistic traces, after all, with out disclosing my largely pleasant relationship with Mr. Wolff. I first encountered him in 2009, when he profiled my then-employer, Politico, and wrote in passing that I used to be a “total dweeb” who was “the only one as interested in what his sources are doing as they themselves are.” I felt each insulted and just about seen.
After that, I sought him out for infrequent profession recommendation, which he gave generously. In 2014, he invited me to a dinner with executives at Uber, and uncared for to ask me to agree that it was off the file. When I printed one government’s explosive suggestion to me that the corporate dig up dust on the journalists who had been masking the corporate, Mr. Wolff, then a columnist for USA Today, blasted me in print as “a gotcha political blogger” who had grown “censorious and moralistic.” (Fair.) A few weeks later, he took additional revenge by publishing an indiscreet remark I had made to him in non-public. I used to be livid. I additionally figured we had been even. And after I was considering final yr about writing a e-book, I requested him how to do it. He informed me, You begin with a clean piece of paper, and on the highest, you write the sum of money you need.
Mr. Wolff appears to be following his personal recommendation as he cashes in on the success of “Fire and Fury” together with his third e-book in 4 years. But he gives a scarce commodity in a media market that has moved away from his type of journalism. A sizzling political surroundings has taught many reporters to see their work in ethical, even didactic, phrases. Magazine writers are out on the lookout for heroes, not villains, they usually seem to have little curiosity in understanding why our unhealthy males do the issues they do.
But monsters are fascinating. And Mr. Wolff “doesn’t have that sort of natural recoil to some of the more odious people in the world,” mentioned Janice Min, his former editor at The Hollywood Reporter.
After we parted, he emailed me that he would favor that his beat not be described as “elderly sex abusers.” It has merely turned out that the category of media moguls he covers “has turned out to, disproportionately, include many sex abusers,” he mentioned.
That era might, ultimately, be ageing out, that means Mr. Wolff dangers working out of topics. When I requested who will maintain his curiosity within the years to come, he mentioned he was “scouting the next generation” of highly effective media figures.
“Too Famous” features a few of them — Jared Kushner, Tucker Carlson and Ronan Farrow. And Mr. Carlson, for one, was joyful to sit down with Mr. Wolff. “He is one of the last interesting people in American media,” Mr. Carlson texted me. “Anyone who doubts that should have lunch with him.”